arXiv:2603.00267v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Misinformation spreading over the Internet poses a significant threat to both societies and individuals, necessitating robust and scalable fact-checking that relies on retrieving accurate and trustworthy evidence. Previous methods rely on semantic and social-contextual patterns learned from training data, which limits their generalization to new data distributions. Recently, Retrieval Augmented Generation (RAG) based methods have been proposed to utilize the reasoning capability of LLMs with retrieved grounding evidence documents. However, these methods largely rely on textual similarity for evidence retrieval and struggle to retrieve evidence that captures multi-hop semantic relations within rich document contents. These limitations lead to overlooking subtle factual correlations between the evidence and the claims to be fact-checked during evidence retrieval, thus causing inaccurate veracity predictions. To address these issues, we propose WKGFC, which exploits authorized open knowledge graph as a core resource of evidence. LLM-enabled retrieval is designed to assess the claims and retrieve the most relevant knowledge subgraphs, forming structured evidence for fact verification. To augment the knowledge graph evidence, we retrieve web contents for completion. The above process is implemented as an automatic Markov Decision Process (MDP): A reasoning LLM agent decides what actions to take according to the current evidence and the claims. To adapt the MDP for fact-checking, we use prompt optimization to fine-tune the agentic LLM.

arXiv:2603.00285v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Evaluating AI agents in finance faces two key challenges: static benchmarks require costly expert annotation yet miss the dynamic decision-making central to real-world trading, while LLM-based judges introduce uncontrolled variance on domain-specific tasks. We introduce TraderBench, a benchmark that addresses both issues. It combines expert-verified static tasks (knowledge retrieval, analytical reasoning) with adversarial trading simulations scored purely on realized performance-Sharpe ratio, returns, and drawdown-eliminating judge variance entirely. The framework features two novel tracks: crypto trading with four progressive market-manipulation transforms, and options derivatives scoring across P&L accuracy, Greeks, and risk management. Trading scenarios can be refreshed with new market data to prevent benchmark contamination. Evaluating 13 models (8B open-source to frontier) on ~50 tasks, we find: (1) 8 of 13 models score ~33 on crypto with <1-point variation across adversarial conditions, exposing fixed non-adaptive strategies; (2) extended thinking helps retrieval (+26 points) but has zero impact on trading (+0.3 crypto, -0.1 options). These findings reveal that current agents lack genuine market adaptation, underscoring the need for performance-grounded evaluation in finance.

arXiv:2603.00309v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: The increasingly popular agentic AI paradigm promises to harness the power of multiple, general-purpose large language model (LLM) agents to collaboratively complete complex tasks. While many agentic AI systems utilize predefined workflows or agent roles in order to reduce complexity, ideally these agents would be truly autonomous, able to achieve emergent collaboration even as the number of collaborating agents increases. Yet in practice, such unstructured interactions can lead to redundant work and cascading failures that are difficult to interpret or correct. In this work, we study multi-agent systems composed of general-purpose LLM agents that operate without predefined roles, control flow, or communication constraints, relying instead on emergent collaboration to solve problems. We introduce the Dynamic Interaction Graph (DIG), which captures emergent collaboration as a time-evolving causal network of agent activations and interactions. DIG makes emergent collaboration observable and explainable for the first time, enabling real-time identification, explanation, and correction of collaboration-induced error patterns directly from agents' collaboration paths. Thus, DIG fills a critical gap in understanding how general LLM agents solve problems together in truly agentic multi-agent systems. The project webpage can be found at: https://happyeureka.github.io/dig.

arXiv:2603.00312v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: While multimodal large language models offer a promising solution to the "black box" nature of health AI by generating interpretable reasoning traces, verifying the validity of these traces remains a critical challenge. Existing evaluation methods are either unscalable, relying on manual clinician review, or superficial, utilizing proxy metrics (e.g. QA) that fail to capture the semantic correctness of clinical logic. In this work, we introduce a reproducible framework for evaluating reasoning in ECG signals. We propose decomposing reasoning into two distinct, components: (i) Perception, the accurate identification of patterns within the raw signal, and (ii) Deduction, the logical application of domain knowledge to those patterns. To evaluate Perception, we employ an agentic framework that generates code to empirically verify the temporal structures described in the reasoning trace. To evaluate Deduction, we measure the alignment of the model's logic against a structured database of established clinical criteria in a retrieval-based approach. This dual-verification method enables the scalable assessment of "true" reasoning capabilities.

arXiv:2603.00349v1 Announce Type: new Abstract: Real-world scenarios increasingly require multiple embodied agents to collaborate in dynamic environments under embodied constraints, as many tasks exceed the capabilities of any single agent. Recent advances in large language models (LLMs) enable high-level cognitive coordination through reasoning, planning, and natural language communication. However, fine-grained analyses of how such collaboration emerges, unfolds, and contributes to task success in embodied multi-agent systems are difficult to conduct with existing benchmarks. In this paper, we introduce EmCoop, a benchmark framework for studying cooperation in LLM-based embodied multi-agent systems. Our framework separates a high-level cognitive layer from a low-level embodied interaction layer, allowing us to characterize agent cooperation through their interleaved dynamics over time. Given a cooperation-constrained embodied task, we propose generalizable, process-level metrics that diagnose collaboration quality and failure modes, beyond final task success. We instantiate our framework in two embodied environments that scale to arbitrary numbers of agents and support diverse communication topologies, and use these instantiations to demonstrate how EmCoop enables systematic analysis of cooperation dynamics across team sizes and task settings. The project web page can be found at: https://happyeureka.github.io/emcoop.

Comments

Comments

Comments